Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6021 - 6030 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
Search results 6021 - 6030 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
Kelly Shisler v. Craig Frank
requested a trial de novo pursuant to § 799.207(3), Stats. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12863 - 2005-03-31
requested a trial de novo pursuant to § 799.207(3), Stats. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12863 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89344 - 2014-09-15
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kimberly Kirwin Holum v. General Motors Corporation
presents a matter of statutory interpretation which creates a de novo standard of review. See Rhiel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13124 - 2017-09-21
presents a matter of statutory interpretation which creates a de novo standard of review. See Rhiel v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13124 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dorene A. Goswitz v. Harlan R. Heinz
a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14777 - 2017-09-21
a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14777 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven W. Brycki
an investigatory stop was legally justified is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Fields, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3576 - 2017-09-19
an investigatory stop was legally justified is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Fields, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3576 - 2017-09-19
Paige K.B. v. Louis J. Molepske
, 873-74 (1977); de Montigny v. de Montigny, 70 Wis.2d 131, 142, 233 N.W.2d 463, 469 (1975). They argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11411 - 2005-03-31
, 873-74 (1977); de Montigny v. de Montigny, 70 Wis.2d 131, 142, 233 N.W.2d 463, 469 (1975). They argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121176 - 2014-09-15
the lawyer’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Roger D. Johnson v. ABC Insurance Company
judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4722 - 2017-09-19
judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4722 - 2017-09-19
Waukesha County v. Darlene R.
was submitted by Janice M. De Witt of De Witt Law Offices of West Bend as advocate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9234 - 2005-03-31
was submitted by Janice M. De Witt of De Witt Law Offices of West Bend as advocate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9234 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 204
by the facts in a particular case is a question of law for appellate courts, reviewable de novo. Salveson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26538 - 2014-09-15
by the facts in a particular case is a question of law for appellate courts, reviewable de novo. Salveson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26538 - 2014-09-15