Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6021 - 6030 of 8266 for gf-175.

Appeal of: Douglas F. Mann v. Bankruptcy Estate of Badger Lines, Inc.
Loken, 175 B.R. 56, 62 (9th Cir. B.A.P. 1994); see also 11 U.S.C. § 547(e)(1)(B). Requiring a creditor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17381 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy B. Panknin
exercised. See State v. Echols, 175 Wis.2d 653, 682, 499 N.W.2d 631, 640 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12519 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. A motion is “an ‘application for an order.’” Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc., 2003 WI App 175, ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101997 - 2013-09-16

State v. Bernard G. Fearing
pending this appeal. [3] In Hayes v. State, 46 Wis. 2d 93, 101, 175 N.W.2d 625 (1970), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16172 - 2005-03-31

United Airlines, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Nat'l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc., 195 Wis.2d 485, 496-97, 536 N.W.2d 175, 182 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14364 - 2005-05-02

Town of Delafield v. Eric Winkelman
175 (Ct. App. 1995). We will reverse a decision granting summary judgment if the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5143 - 2007-04-16

COURT OF APPEALS
factors of record, State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 683, 499 N.W.2d 631 (1993), and may base the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45899 - 2010-01-19

[PDF] WI App 210
must review de novo. It cites Kress Packing Co. v. Kottwitz, 61 Wis. 2d 175, 177, 212 N.W.2d 97
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30103 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Village of DeForest v. County of Dane
be of significance. See Lake Bluff Hous. Partners v. City of South Milwaukee, 197 Wis.2d 157, 175, 540 N.W.2d 189
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10901 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Tamar T. Brown
). The trial court need discuss only the relevant factors in each case. State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20587 - 2017-09-21