Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60211 - 60220 of 63457 for records.
Search results 60211 - 60220 of 63457 for records.
State v. Randall W. Edwards
if discretion was exercised according to accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11393 - 2005-03-31
if discretion was exercised according to accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11393 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stated the terms of the plea bargain on the Record, and Lee told the circuit court that he understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88220 - 2014-09-15
stated the terms of the plea bargain on the Record, and Lee told the circuit court that he understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88220 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy T. Greer
the record that the test was over, the defendant was informed the test was over, and that he was freely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4421 - 2017-09-19
the record that the test was over, the defendant was informed the test was over, and that he was freely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4421 - 2017-09-19
LaVerne T. Yatso v. James E. Auer, M.D.
. There [are] no evidentiary facts supported in the record to establish that he had any duty under the informed consent statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15561 - 2005-03-31
. There [are] no evidentiary facts supported in the record to establish that he had any duty under the informed consent statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15561 - 2005-03-31
Alan Derzon v. New Oji Paper Company, Ltd.
that the record could not support Derzon’s claim that Hansson/New York acted as Oji’s agent in this state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15562 - 2005-03-31
that the record could not support Derzon’s claim that Hansson/New York acted as Oji’s agent in this state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15562 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tommie S. Gray
an evidentiary hearing because the record conclusively demonstrates that Gray is not entitled to relief. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12632 - 2017-09-21
an evidentiary hearing because the record conclusively demonstrates that Gray is not entitled to relief. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12632 - 2017-09-21
Richmond Ato Yarney v. State
), Stats. “A final judgment or final order is a judgment, order or disposition [court record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12482 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. “A final judgment or final order is a judgment, order or disposition [court record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12482 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin M.R.
to review the record and the trial judge's comments to determine whether his order can be sustained despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10062 - 2017-09-19
to review the record and the trial judge's comments to determine whether his order can be sustained despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10062 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP1954-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2004CF141
to the psychologically coercive tactics of the examiner as detailed in the record.” Id. at 285 (emphasis added
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29496 - 2014-09-15
to the psychologically coercive tactics of the examiner as detailed in the record.” Id. at 285 (emphasis added
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29496 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michael J. Kaufman v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation
’ appellate brief, they concede $15,000 of this payment was allocated to Michelle. The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6883 - 2017-09-20
’ appellate brief, they concede $15,000 of this payment was allocated to Michelle. The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6883 - 2017-09-20