Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6031 - 6040 of 83320 for case search.

[PDF] JC-1611; Dispositional Order - Protection or Services (Chapter 48)
– Protección o Servicios (Capítulo 48) Case No. Causa No. This form does not replace the need
/formdisplay/JC-1611T_es.pdf?formNumber=JC-1611T&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=es - 2025-05-20

[PDF] State v. Deon McGraw
suppression motion challenging the constitutionality of his warrantless vehicle search. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11622 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
search of a vehicle. State v. Torgerson, 995 N.W.2d 164 (Minn. 2023). This case involves reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857880 - 2024-10-08

[PDF] State v. John L. Griffin
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0914-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12292 - 2017-09-21

State v. William Sid DuPree
, and transported from the scene, the officer conducted a pat-down search and discovered a white cocaine-like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15892 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
), and improperly searched his vehicle incident to arrest. We affirm the judgments. Background ¶2 The sole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35454 - 2009-02-04

Village of Little Chute v. Todd A. Walitalo
2002 WI App 211 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-3060 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4597 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Village of Little Chute v. Todd A. Walitalo
2002 WI App 211 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-3060
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4597 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
Kestler that he was being detained. He then forcefully placed Kestler in handcuffs, and searched him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32258 - 2008-03-26

City of Delavan v. Roger Sterken
because the merits of the instant case were not fully litigated before the municipal court. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20368 - 2005-11-22