Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6031 - 6040 of 16408 for commentating.
Search results 6031 - 6040 of 16408 for commentating.
State v. Kurt W. Meyer
to Meyer as a “thug.” The prosecutor made the comment to describe how she believed another witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5750 - 2005-03-31
to Meyer as a “thug.” The prosecutor made the comment to describe how she believed another witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5750 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to prevail. See SCR 20:3.1, comment (action is not frivolous even though the lawyer believes his or her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122951 - 2014-09-29
to prevail. See SCR 20:3.1, comment (action is not frivolous even though the lawyer believes his or her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122951 - 2014-09-29
[PDF]
WI 14
of the people who appeared or commented on the petition favored its adoption. The single point of opposition
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78599 - 2014-09-15
of the people who appeared or commented on the petition favored its adoption. The single point of opposition
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78599 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David A. H.
comments show that it was applying the relevant law to the facts of record. We see no misuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3558 - 2017-09-19
comments show that it was applying the relevant law to the facts of record. We see no misuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3558 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s comment was a misstatement or it applied the incorrect standard at that particular point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100587 - 2017-09-21
court’s comment was a misstatement or it applied the incorrect standard at that particular point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100587 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donshea L. Trotter
him. He argues that one comment in particular establishes that the court erred when sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7144 - 2005-03-31
him. He argues that one comment in particular establishes that the court erred when sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7144 - 2005-03-31
County of Marquette v. Robert DeWitz
officer visited the property but made no comment or objection concerning the wall. There was also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25188 - 2006-05-17
officer visited the property but made no comment or objection concerning the wall. There was also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25188 - 2006-05-17
State v. David A. H.
prejudice analysis. ¶10 In sum, all of the trial court’s comments show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3558 - 2005-03-31
prejudice analysis. ¶10 In sum, all of the trial court’s comments show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3558 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court may have assumed without deciding that COVID-19 was a new factor, because its comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435309 - 2021-10-05
court may have assumed without deciding that COVID-19 was a new factor, because its comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435309 - 2021-10-05
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendations without comment or analysis. We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30513 - 2007-10-03
recommendations without comment or analysis. We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30513 - 2007-10-03