Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6031 - 6040 of 29424 for er.
Search results 6031 - 6040 of 29424 for er.
State v. Brian J. Leiteritz
. The issue on appeal is whether the circuit court erred when it refused to allow Leiteritz to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6055 - 2005-03-31
. The issue on appeal is whether the circuit court erred when it refused to allow Leiteritz to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6055 - 2005-03-31
James Munroe v. Kenneth Morgan
,” and that the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint. We reject his arguments and affirm the order. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11027 - 2005-03-31
,” and that the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint. We reject his arguments and affirm the order. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11027 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
offense. Cushman argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress. The court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
offense. Cushman argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress. The court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72524 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction for operating while intoxicated, second offense. On appeal, Buesgens argues the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80137 - 2012-03-26
of conviction for operating while intoxicated, second offense. On appeal, Buesgens argues the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80137 - 2012-03-26
Mary K. Fischer v. The AmPacis Company
, breach-of-contract action against AmPacis. AmPacis argues that the trial court erred in interpreting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9963 - 2005-03-31
, breach-of-contract action against AmPacis. AmPacis argues that the trial court erred in interpreting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9963 - 2005-03-31
Nate A. Lindell v. Matthew Frank
Lindell first contends that the circuit court erred when it found no merit to his sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26482 - 2006-09-13
Lindell first contends that the circuit court erred when it found no merit to his sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26482 - 2006-09-13
State v. Ralanda Nicole Lee
home were in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and, therefore, the trial court erred in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11879 - 2005-03-31
home were in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and, therefore, the trial court erred in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11879 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Automotive & Truck Services, Inc. The Reifs argue on appeal that the circuit court erred when it determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34747 - 2008-12-02
Automotive & Truck Services, Inc. The Reifs argue on appeal that the circuit court erred when it determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34747 - 2008-12-02
[PDF]
TKO, Ltd. v. Wayne Manternach
that the circuit court properly granted summary judgment on the counterclaims, but erred in granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13166 - 2017-09-21
that the circuit court properly granted summary judgment on the counterclaims, but erred in granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13166 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael C. Cull
in a one-year revocation, and contends that the trial court erred by finding that he refused the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13225 - 2017-09-21
in a one-year revocation, and contends that the trial court erred by finding that he refused the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13225 - 2017-09-21