Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60321 - 60330 of 84039 for simple case search.
Search results 60321 - 60330 of 84039 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Carlos A. Barrera appeals from judgments convicting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584403 - 2022-11-02
. RULE 809.23(3). In these consolidated cases, Carlos A. Barrera appeals from judgments convicting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584403 - 2022-11-02
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234580 - 2019-02-08
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234580 - 2019-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factors applicable to the case. The circuit court noted that while Brown had a criminal history
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591997 - 2022-11-22
factors applicable to the case. The circuit court noted that while Brown had a criminal history
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591997 - 2022-11-22
State v. Arrmond B.
jeopardy protections apply to juveniles in delinquency cases. Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9999 - 2005-03-31
jeopardy protections apply to juveniles in delinquency cases. Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519 (1975
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9999 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138247 - 2015-03-18
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138247 - 2015-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Thompson
to the facts of the case and arrived at a conclusion consistent with applicable law. See State v. Eison, 194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12548 - 2017-09-21
to the facts of the case and arrived at a conclusion consistent with applicable law. See State v. Eison, 194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12548 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605276 - 2022-12-28
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605276 - 2022-12-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(the Village). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139536 - 2017-09-21
(the Village). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139536 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
traditional sentencing factors have ever been meaningfully considered in this case.” Ries's interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9620 - 2005-03-31
traditional sentencing factors have ever been meaningfully considered in this case.” Ries's interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9620 - 2005-03-31
Harold E. Krause, Jr. v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-0915-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17234 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-0915-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17234 - 2005-03-31