Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60381 - 60390 of 65252 for or b.
Search results 60381 - 60390 of 65252 for or b.
State v. Eugene W.
is contested, the court shall hold an evidentiary hearing. Wis. Stat. § 971.14(4)(b). If the defendant claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4330 - 2005-03-31
is contested, the court shall hold an evidentiary hearing. Wis. Stat. § 971.14(4)(b). If the defendant claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4330 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision time. WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05(3)(c)2., 302.045(3m)(b); but see State v. Gramza, 2020 WI App 81, ¶3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
supervision time. WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05(3)(c)2., 302.045(3m)(b); but see State v. Gramza, 2020 WI App 81, ¶3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023134 - 2025-10-14
State v. Donald J. McGuire
in the official reports. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7563 - 2005-03-31
in the official reports. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7563 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Kirch, 222 Wis. 2d 598, 587 N.W.2d 919 (Ct. App. 1998), we addressed Wis. Stat. § 973.075(1)(b)2. (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114192 - 2014-06-10
. Kirch, 222 Wis. 2d 598, 587 N.W.2d 919 (Ct. App. 1998), we addressed Wis. Stat. § 973.075(1)(b)2. (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114192 - 2014-06-10
State v. David C. Tutlewski
on this very same principle of law, we reject the State’s waiver claim.[2] B. Haseltine ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14455 - 2005-03-31
on this very same principle of law, we reject the State’s waiver claim.[2] B. Haseltine ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14455 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] We will follow the parties’ practice of referring to Mark and Alan Seidl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63390 - 2011-05-02
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] We will follow the parties’ practice of referring to Mark and Alan Seidl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63390 - 2011-05-02
State v. Larry Howard
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14294 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] The judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14294 - 2005-03-31
State v. Troy Key
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Appellate counsel's misrepresentation surpasses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9714 - 2005-03-31
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Appellate counsel's misrepresentation surpasses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9714 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sebastian C. Ransom
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] “An Alford plea is a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2894 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] “An Alford plea is a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subsection is § 804.07(1)(b), which permits the deposition of a party to be used by an adverse party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194761 - 2017-10-09
subsection is § 804.07(1)(b), which permits the deposition of a party to be used by an adverse party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194761 - 2017-10-09