Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6041 - 6050 of 68875 for he.
Search results 6041 - 6050 of 68875 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams contends he should be allowed to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams contends he should be allowed to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
here[?]” to which the attorney responded that he had. The court was referring to an informal court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=836256 - 2024-08-08
here[?]” to which the attorney responded that he had. The court was referring to an informal court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=836256 - 2024-08-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
. RULE 809.30 (2007-08)1 and the reappointment of counsel. Fecht contends that he was denied his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41620 - 2014-09-15
. RULE 809.30 (2007-08)1 and the reappointment of counsel. Fecht contends that he was denied his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
here[?]” to which the attorney responded that he had. The court was referring to an informal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=836256 - 2024-08-08
here[?]” to which the attorney responded that he had. The court was referring to an informal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=836256 - 2024-08-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on May 29, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. Bernitt appeared in court as directed, and he entered not-guilty pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255302 - 2020-02-25
on May 29, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. Bernitt appeared in court as directed, and he entered not-guilty pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255302 - 2020-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and informed of his right to respond, but he did not do so. After reviewing the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183299 - 2017-09-21
of the report and informed of his right to respond, but he did not do so. After reviewing the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183299 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
homicide. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for a new sentencing hearing in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34224 - 2008-10-06
homicide. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for a new sentencing hearing in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34224 - 2008-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25
an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
that on July 20, 2012, he spoke with a witness who reported that he had overheard yelling and screaming outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133337 - 2015-01-21
that on July 20, 2012, he spoke with a witness who reported that he had overheard yelling and screaming outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133337 - 2015-01-21
State v. John R. Lootans
on appeal. First, he asserts that the State failed to show that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
on appeal. First, he asserts that the State failed to show that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31