Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6041 - 6050 of 58581 for speedy trial.
Search results 6041 - 6050 of 58581 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Ryan C. Krupp
into evidence at trial. He also alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5986 - 2017-09-19
into evidence at trial. He also alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5986 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bryon P. Cibrario
that the trial court’s plea colloquy was defective because the court failed to personally inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26279 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court’s plea colloquy was defective because the court failed to personally inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Anne E. Czarnecki v. Paul A. Czarnecki
in contempt. She claims that the trial court's written order materially differs from No. 96-0195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10281 - 2017-09-20
in contempt. She claims that the trial court's written order materially differs from No. 96-0195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10281 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Tito Quixte Grimes
argues that the trial court erroneously exercised sentencing discretion and improperly denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10539 - 2017-09-20
argues that the trial court erroneously exercised sentencing discretion and improperly denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10539 - 2017-09-20
State v. James Durrah
months that the trial court mistakenly believed he faced. He couples that with the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2236 - 2005-03-31
months that the trial court mistakenly believed he faced. He couples that with the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2236 - 2005-03-31
Richard Sielaff v. Milwaukee County
. Sielaff claims: (1) the trial court erred in excluding evidence of twelve promotions that Sielaff did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8566 - 2005-03-31
. Sielaff claims: (1) the trial court erred in excluding evidence of twelve promotions that Sielaff did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8566 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by imposing an “excessive sentence” after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69297 - 2011-08-08
that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by imposing an “excessive sentence” after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69297 - 2011-08-08
[PDF]
Howard R. Wagner v. County of Burnett
their motion for relief from judgment moot.1 They argue the trial court erred by finding their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13468 - 2017-09-21
their motion for relief from judgment moot.1 They argue the trial court erred by finding their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13468 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sagler Masonry & Concrete v. Jeff Netzer
. VERGERONT, J.1 Jeff Netzer appeals from the trial court order denying his motion to reopen a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10869 - 2017-09-20
. VERGERONT, J.1 Jeff Netzer appeals from the trial court order denying his motion to reopen a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10869 - 2017-09-20
Sagler Masonry & Concrete v. Jeff Netzer
. VERGERONT, J.[1] Jeff Netzer appeals from the trial court order denying his motion to reopen a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10869 - 2005-03-31
. VERGERONT, J.[1] Jeff Netzer appeals from the trial court order denying his motion to reopen a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10869 - 2005-03-31