Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60491 - 60500 of 84039 for simple case search.
Search results 60491 - 60500 of 84039 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166050 - 2017-09-21
the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166050 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927708 - 2025-03-18
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927708 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Rodney Dombrowski
to enhance his sentence because his waiver of counsel in each of those cases was not knowing, intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5774 - 2017-09-19
to enhance his sentence because his waiver of counsel in each of those cases was not knowing, intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5774 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case No. 2018AP1688-CR 2 is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245072 - 2019-08-14
conclude at conference that this case No. 2018AP1688-CR 2 is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245072 - 2019-08-14
State v. David Buck
but was licensed in Illinois. He asked permission to represent Buck in this case. Counsel explained his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15453 - 2005-03-31
but was licensed in Illinois. He asked permission to represent Buck in this case. Counsel explained his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15453 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. VanPatter
is the need to protect the public. [This case involves v]ery serious conduct, [and a] great need to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10505 - 2005-03-31
is the need to protect the public. [This case involves v]ery serious conduct, [and a] great need to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10505 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment to the Town of Germantown. We affirm. ΒΆ2 The undisputed facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48114 - 2010-03-17
summary judgment to the Town of Germantown. We affirm. ΒΆ2 The undisputed facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48114 - 2010-03-17
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65884 - 2011-06-12
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65884 - 2011-06-12
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92606 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92606 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96631 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96631 - 2014-09-15