Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60511 - 60520 of 83433 for simple case search.
Search results 60511 - 60520 of 83433 for simple case search.
State v. Douglas D.
. This case involves the application of constitutional principles and a statute to a set of undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15718 - 2005-03-31
. This case involves the application of constitutional principles and a statute to a set of undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15718 - 2005-03-31
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
abandonment as a ground for termination; (2) it was also “intrinsically unfair” to send the case to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2363 - 2005-03-31
abandonment as a ground for termination; (2) it was also “intrinsically unfair” to send the case to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2363 - 2005-03-31
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
abandonment as a ground for termination; (2) it was also “intrinsically unfair” to send the case to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2364 - 2005-03-31
abandonment as a ground for termination; (2) it was also “intrinsically unfair” to send the case to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2364 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and No. 2019AP1430 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288285 - 2020-09-16
of the briefs and No. 2019AP1430 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288285 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367802 - 2021-05-19
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367802 - 2021-05-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, effective January 1, 2007. The date of the final order in the present case is January 17, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33445 - 2014-09-15
, effective January 1, 2007. The date of the final order in the present case is January 17, 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33445 - 2014-09-15
State v. Cornelius F.
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5914 - 2005-03-31
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5914 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cornelius F.
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5916 - 2005-03-31
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5916 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Lynch have taken his case to trial, that he would testify against Mr. Lynch, and based on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14
. Lynch have taken his case to trial, that he would testify against Mr. Lynch, and based on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
. schroeder, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 REILLY, J.[1] This case requires us to decide the propriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84068 - 2012-06-26
. schroeder, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 REILLY, J.[1] This case requires us to decide the propriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84068 - 2012-06-26