Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60531 - 60540 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 60531 - 60540 of 83431 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Booker T. Shipp
performance, at and prior to trial, and such deficient performance was prejudicial to defendant’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12868 - 2017-09-21
performance, at and prior to trial, and such deficient performance was prejudicial to defendant’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12868 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Holden
, 115 S. Ct. 1555, 1567-68 (1995). Failure to do so imperils the case. NO. 96-2182-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11183 - 2017-09-19
, 115 S. Ct. 1555, 1567-68 (1995). Failure to do so imperils the case. NO. 96-2182-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
State v. Jose G.
terminating his parental rights to Joe F. The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10894 - 2017-09-20
terminating his parental rights to Joe F. The dispositive issue in this case is whether the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10894 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Toran D. Brooks
. ANALYSIS No. 98-0440-CR 3 The issue in this case involves whether or not the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13635 - 2017-09-21
. ANALYSIS No. 98-0440-CR 3 The issue in this case involves whether or not the suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13635 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234712 - 2019-02-11
briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234712 - 2019-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The restrictive covenant at issue in this case was agreed upon and recorded by predecessors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333227 - 2021-02-09
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The restrictive covenant at issue in this case was agreed upon and recorded by predecessors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333227 - 2021-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
] Nevertheless, the same logic would extend to charge concessions in this case—the circuit court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60766 - 2011-03-07
] Nevertheless, the same logic would extend to charge concessions in this case—the circuit court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60766 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are not the Owner” of each of the five specifically identified motorcycles at issue in this case. The requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576895 - 2022-10-12
are not the Owner” of each of the five specifically identified motorcycles at issue in this case. The requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576895 - 2022-10-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208821 - 2018-02-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208821 - 2018-02-21