Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60561 - 60570 of 83479 for simple case search.
Search results 60561 - 60570 of 83479 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246295 - 2019-09-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246295 - 2019-09-04
State v. Cornelius F.
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5914 - 2005-03-31
The pertinent facts of this case begin on September 24, 1997, when Jarquita E., William C.F., Drena F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5914 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234712 - 2019-02-11
briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234712 - 2019-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Westcott
that the court did not sentence based partly on speculative assertions of fact. We affirm. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
that the court did not sentence based partly on speculative assertions of fact. We affirm. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12076 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
5 Ashland County Circuit Court cases: 15 counts of knowingly violating a domestic abuse injunction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026974 - 2025-10-21
5 Ashland County Circuit Court cases: 15 counts of knowingly violating a domestic abuse injunction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026974 - 2025-10-21
CA Blank Order
and Blanchard, JJ. Victoria Niemczyk appeals her judgments of conviction and sentences entered in five cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21
and Blanchard, JJ. Victoria Niemczyk appeals her judgments of conviction and sentences entered in five cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92004 - 2013-01-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument as contrary to the plain language of the statute and prior case law. ¶7 Next, Ramczyk argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
argument as contrary to the plain language of the statute and prior case law. ¶7 Next, Ramczyk argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
to the facts of Burris’s case, and that credible evidence supported the jury’s verdict. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114086 - 2014-06-09
to the facts of Burris’s case, and that credible evidence supported the jury’s verdict. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114086 - 2014-06-09
State v. Donald B.
). ¶8 The case was presented to a jury in August 1999. The jury returned a unanimous verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2328 - 2005-03-31
). ¶8 The case was presented to a jury in August 1999. The jury returned a unanimous verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2328 - 2005-03-31