Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 83281 for case search.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 83281 for case search.
State v. Anthony M. Reynolds
it: (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of the residence where he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10504 - 2005-03-31
it: (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of the residence where he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10504 - 2005-03-31
Allen J. Thomas v. Kenneth N. Johnson
in the jail, jail officials searched his cell and confiscated papers after they learned of a plot by other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9534 - 2005-03-31
in the jail, jail officials searched his cell and confiscated papers after they learned of a plot by other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9534 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of narcotic drugs (oxycodone) (Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2016CF5453); possession of a firearm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502740 - 2022-04-05
of narcotic drugs (oxycodone) (Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2016CF5453); possession of a firearm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502740 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
State v. Quathico D. Love
the court’s finding that he consented to a search was clearly erroneous. We conclude it was not, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13722 - 2014-09-15
the court’s finding that he consented to a search was clearly erroneous. We conclude it was not, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13722 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197972 - 2017-10-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197972 - 2017-10-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
). No. 2008AP836 2 exercised its discretion when it failed to dismiss the case with prejudice. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35494 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2008AP836 2 exercised its discretion when it failed to dismiss the case with prejudice. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35494 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
its discretion when it failed to dismiss the case with prejudice. Because the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35494 - 2009-02-09
its discretion when it failed to dismiss the case with prejudice. Because the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35494 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” because the deputy did not want to conduct a search alone, with two subjects present. In a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170917 - 2017-09-21
,” because the deputy did not want to conduct a search alone, with two subjects present. In a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170917 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that, in connection with his investigation of this case, he executed a search warrant of a trailer. The search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344718 - 2021-03-11
that, in connection with his investigation of this case, he executed a search warrant of a trailer. The search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344718 - 2021-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
guilt or innocence in this case, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 905.10(3)(b) (2011-12).[1] For the reasons we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94658 - 2013-03-27
guilt or innocence in this case, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 905.10(3)(b) (2011-12).[1] For the reasons we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94658 - 2013-03-27