Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 16449 for commentating.
[PDF]
James W. Parlow v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
discussion of that comment. Parlow asserts that this statement by his attorney was sufficient to preserve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19702 - 2017-09-21
discussion of that comment. Parlow asserts that this statement by his attorney was sufficient to preserve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19702 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The trial court further commented on Talajkowski’s ability to respond to directions as additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28519 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court further commented on Talajkowski’s ability to respond to directions as additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28519 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
characterization of the circuit court’s comments. The circuit court stated that the sentence might be lengthy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93206 - 2013-02-18
characterization of the circuit court’s comments. The circuit court stated that the sentence might be lengthy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93206 - 2013-02-18
[PDF]
James A. Shives v. William L. Powell
findings or were intended as comments related to its view of the burden of proof. Therefore we remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15539 - 2017-09-21
findings or were intended as comments related to its view of the burden of proof. Therefore we remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15539 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
not constitute a new factor as a matter of law. Nothing in the court’s sentencing comments reveal a reliance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95329 - 2013-04-16
not constitute a new factor as a matter of law. Nothing in the court’s sentencing comments reveal a reliance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95329 - 2013-04-16
State v. Donshea L. Trotter
him. He argues that one comment in particular establishes that the court erred when sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7144 - 2005-03-31
him. He argues that one comment in particular establishes that the court erred when sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7144 - 2005-03-31
State v. John S. Spicer
and the victim’s comments to her sister, so there was a plausible basis for making the objection. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21627 - 2006-03-01
and the victim’s comments to her sister, so there was a plausible basis for making the objection. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21627 - 2006-03-01
CA Blank Order
the original sentencing judge, it is important for the second sentencing judge to be aware of the comments made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94386 - 2013-03-26
the original sentencing judge, it is important for the second sentencing judge to be aware of the comments made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94386 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court may have assumed without deciding that COVID-19 was a new factor, because its comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435309 - 2021-10-05
court may have assumed without deciding that COVID-19 was a new factor, because its comments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435309 - 2021-10-05
State v. Joseph Robert Wilcox
it commented [at trial] that defense counsel had not cross-examined the alleged victim regarding the making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21466 - 2006-02-21
it commented [at trial] that defense counsel had not cross-examined the alleged victim regarding the making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21466 - 2006-02-21