Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 30108 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
designation.” (Emphasis added). ¶10 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140358 - 2017-09-21

Duane Lesky v. County of La Crosse
We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14245 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ernest E. Burton
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3479 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
identification is a legal No. 2017AP968-CR 7 issue that we review de novo. See id. (application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209372 - 2018-03-06

[PDF] NOTICE
court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Sherry v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51118 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Citizens for the Preservation of the St. Croix, Inc. v. Riviera Airport, Inc.
of law we review de novo. Welter v. City of Milwaukee, 198 Wis.2d 636, 643, 543 N.W.2d 815, 817 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12106 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Dorene A. Goswitz v. Harlan R. Heinz
a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14777 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Farrah E. Lott
of a suppression motion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. O’Brien, 223 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7096 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment motions de novo, applying the same methodology as the [circuit] court.” Brown v. Acuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97984 - 2013-06-10

Sharon Kabes v. The School District of River Falls
Falls, and this appeal follows. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6196 - 2005-03-31