Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 30108 for consulta de causas.

Julie L. Rabideau v. City of Racine
as a review of a summary judgment. ¶7 We review the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16313 - 2005-03-31

State v. Farrah E. Lott
for purposes of a suppression motion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. O’Brien
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7096 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ron Guenther v. City of Onalaska
. This appeal followed. DISCUSSION Standard of Review. This court reviews summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13740 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Leon J. Lace
364 (1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3940 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court denied Rodriguez’s petition without a hearing, we will review de novo whether the allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92114 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
. ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43242 - 2014-09-15

Katherine Kaatz v. Tommy E. Hamilton
the doctrine of claim preclusion applies under a given set of facts is a question of law we must review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10335 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Shawn Riley
de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. No. 00-0687-CR 5 1. Alford plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2378 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
. 48, we conduct that part of our review de novo. See Sallie T., 219 Wis. 2d at 305, 581 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15192 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Aurora Medical Group v. Department of Workforce Development
the Department’s decision de novo. The Department responds: Since judicial review in Miller commenced in 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14087 - 2014-09-15