Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 19343 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 19343 for transfer by affidavit.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. The motion was supported by an affidavit from defense counsel stating that one of the Satoriuses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88802 - 2012-10-29
judgment. The motion was supported by an affidavit from defense counsel stating that one of the Satoriuses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88802 - 2012-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Jones
the district attorney, Soderberg, Jones and Cruz signed. Jones, in both an interview and a sworn affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12659 - 2017-09-21
the district attorney, Soderberg, Jones and Cruz signed. Jones, in both an interview and a sworn affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12659 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 114
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28367 - 2007-04-26
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28367 - 2007-04-26
State v. Kevin L. Jones
. Jones, in both an interview and a sworn affidavit, then told Soderberg all of the information he knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12659 - 2005-03-31
. Jones, in both an interview and a sworn affidavit, then told Soderberg all of the information he knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12659 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by an affidavit from defense counsel stating that one of the Satoriuses’ medical experts had withdrawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88802 - 2014-09-15
by an affidavit from defense counsel stating that one of the Satoriuses’ medical experts had withdrawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88802 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Malachi Watkins v. Michelle Watkins
this state may be made by affidavit of the individual who made the service, or in the manner prescribed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2610 - 2017-09-19
this state may be made by affidavit of the individual who made the service, or in the manner prescribed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2610 - 2017-09-19
Mary Herr v. Rodolph J. Lanaghan
restitution.[1] According to an affidavit provided by counsel for DeBraska, there was a conference call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21580 - 2006-02-23
restitution.[1] According to an affidavit provided by counsel for DeBraska, there was a conference call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21580 - 2006-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
validity, claiming that the supporting affidavit failed to No. 2018AP1903-CRNM 6 set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503204 - 2022-04-06
validity, claiming that the supporting affidavit failed to No. 2018AP1903-CRNM 6 set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503204 - 2022-04-06
Malachi Watkins v. Michelle Watkins
in this state. (3) Proof of service outside this state may be made by affidavit of the individual who made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2610 - 2005-03-31
in this state. (3) Proof of service outside this state may be made by affidavit of the individual who made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2610 - 2005-03-31
Steven Derkson v. Troy Haarstick
Haarstick’s motion for remittitur because Haarstick did not file a brief, affidavits, or other documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2807 - 2012-04-26
Haarstick’s motion for remittitur because Haarstick did not file a brief, affidavits, or other documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2807 - 2012-04-26