Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60671 - 60680 of 83351 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 60671 - 60680 of 83351 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
a Terry stop as a temporary investigative stop, much less cite a single case addressing the proper scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56707 - 2010-11-15
a Terry stop as a temporary investigative stop, much less cite a single case addressing the proper scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56707 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872279 - 2024-11-06
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872279 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912407 - 2025-02-11
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912407 - 2025-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation, and again subject to the court’s approval, is imposed and stayed on the sexual assault case 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133685 - 2015-01-26
recommendation, and again subject to the court’s approval, is imposed and stayed on the sexual assault case 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133685 - 2015-01-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
erroneous, and that is not the case here. We affirm. ¶2 At the motion hearing, Judge Carlson heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33033 - 2014-09-15
erroneous, and that is not the case here. We affirm. ¶2 At the motion hearing, Judge Carlson heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33033 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
version unless otherwise noted. [2] This case is distinguishable from our recent decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27034 - 2006-11-06
version unless otherwise noted. [2] This case is distinguishable from our recent decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27034 - 2006-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that his probation in this case had been previously revoked. When Murphy began debating the point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60273 - 2011-02-22
that his probation in this case had been previously revoked. When Murphy began debating the point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60273 - 2011-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
statement of the issues differs from her statement of the case and argument.[3] See Rule 809.19(1)(b), (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71689 - 2011-10-03
statement of the issues differs from her statement of the case and argument.[3] See Rule 809.19(1)(b), (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71689 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643596 - 2023-04-12
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643596 - 2023-04-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court relied on inaccurate information when it imposed the sentences in these cases. At no point did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208937 - 2018-02-27
court relied on inaccurate information when it imposed the sentences in these cases. At no point did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208937 - 2018-02-27