Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6071 - 6080 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.

COURT OF APPEALS
that during the time period for which he seeks credit, Baker was in custody serving a sentence that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35512 - 2009-02-09

State v. Fred V. Vogelsberg
the trial court properly determined that: (1) Vogelsberg reasonably believed that he was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19852 - 2005-10-05

[PDF] State v. Fred V. Vogelsberg
court properly determined that: (1) Vogelsberg reasonably believed that he was in custody at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19852 - 2017-09-21

Buckley J. Kain v. Shelly L. Kain
to Shelly. In the divorce judgment six and one-half months later, the trial court returned custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13832 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Buckley J. Kain v. Shelly L. Kain
. In the divorce judgment six and one- half months later, the trial court returned custody to Buckley. Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13832 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 21
that transmits force, motion, or energy from one part to another in a predetermined way by electrical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777256 - 2024-05-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, see WIS. STAT. ยง 946.49(1)(b). Smith also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101726 - 2017-09-21

Firstar Trust Company v. First National Bank of Kenosha
assets included in Dorothy Cooney's gross estate. Id. The Estate and the Trust filed cross-motions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16875 - 2005-03-31

James Robleski v. C.R. Meyer and Sons Company
motion for a continuance. Ellison cooperated with the other defendants and presented a joint defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14182 - 2005-03-31

Interstate Sealant & Concrete, Inc. v. Robert Schlueter
restoration in direct competition with Interstate, violating the noncompete agreement. On motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6592 - 2005-03-31