Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6071 - 6080 of 64730 for b's.
Search results 6071 - 6080 of 64730 for b's.
State v. Jerry M. Brandt
Brandt appeals judgments convicting him of enticing Heidi B. to enter his car for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12853 - 2005-03-31
Brandt appeals judgments convicting him of enticing Heidi B. to enter his car for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12853 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
period of confinement. See Wis. Stat. § 973.195(1r)(b)3 (2001-02);[1] 2001 Wis. Act 109, § 1143m (eff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
period of confinement. See Wis. Stat. § 973.195(1r)(b)3 (2001-02);[1] 2001 Wis. Act 109, § 1143m (eff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
period of confinement. See Wis. Stat. § 973.195(1r)(b)3 (2001-02);[1] 2001 Wis. Act 109, § 1143m (eff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
period of confinement. See Wis. Stat. § 973.195(1r)(b)3 (2001-02);[1] 2001 Wis. Act 109, § 1143m (eff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
State of Wisconsin ex. rel. Bryce Garrett v. Gerald Berge
because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Wis. Stat. § 801.02(7)(b) (2001-02).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Wis. Stat. § 801.02(7)(b) (2001-02).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Stannard
, Precision Technologies, Inc. (PTI). The State charged them with embezzlement, § 943.20(1)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
, Precision Technologies, Inc. (PTI). The State charged them with embezzlement, § 943.20(1)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jack L. B.
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jack L. B., Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2282 - 2005-03-31
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jack L. B., Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2282 - 2005-03-31
David B. Westrate v. NBI Inc.
David B. Westrate, individually and as assignee of the residual interests of National Business Institute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5894 - 2005-03-31
David B. Westrate, individually and as assignee of the residual interests of National Business Institute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5894 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
” pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(a), (b), and (c). The circuit court denied the motion and the Klappers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140529 - 2015-04-21
” pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(a), (b), and (c). The circuit court denied the motion and the Klappers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140529 - 2015-04-21
In the Matter of the Adoption of a Procedure to Refuse to Grant or to Suspend the License to Practice Law of a Person Certified under Wis. Stat. 49.857 delinquent in Payment of Support of in Noncompliance with a Support or Paternity Subpoena or Warrant
or a child support agency and relating to paternity or support proceedings. (b) “Support” means support
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=978 - 2005-03-31
or a child support agency and relating to paternity or support proceedings. (b) “Support” means support
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=978 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lynn E. Salonen v. Duane G. Powers
any of the following is subject to a Class B forfeiture: ... (b) Engages in a course of conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2901 - 2017-09-19
any of the following is subject to a Class B forfeiture: ... (b) Engages in a course of conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2901 - 2017-09-19