Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6071 - 6080 of 12464 for mr.
Search results 6071 - 6080 of 12464 for mr.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. THE COURT: Mr. Schwarz [defense counsel], are you satisfied that she is knowingly, and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49293 - 2014-09-15
. THE COURT: Mr. Schwarz [defense counsel], are you satisfied that she is knowingly, and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49293 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
indicates that the source of the semen on the anal swabs was not Mr. Peters, but it was somebody else
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380172 - 2021-06-22
indicates that the source of the semen on the anal swabs was not Mr. Peters, but it was somebody else
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380172 - 2021-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
the presentence investigation report, which said: “Mr. Jones impresses me as an extremely dangerous individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54852 - 2010-09-27
the presentence investigation report, which said: “Mr. Jones impresses me as an extremely dangerous individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54852 - 2010-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
testify on this issue, the “court did not wish to hear from Mr. Kohls,” and the court did not cite vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29819 - 2007-07-25
testify on this issue, the “court did not wish to hear from Mr. Kohls,” and the court did not cite vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29819 - 2007-07-25
[PDF]
William J. Keefe v. Ronald A. Arthur
stated: At that point Mr. Keefe began to present what was purported evidence and testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19964 - 2017-09-21
stated: At that point Mr. Keefe began to present what was purported evidence and testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19964 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
on trial counsel’s motion to withdraw, counsel explained: [o]ne thing I would like to make clear to Mr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147257 - 2015-08-24
on trial counsel’s motion to withdraw, counsel explained: [o]ne thing I would like to make clear to Mr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147257 - 2015-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
of an opinion that has specialized knowledge. And the question is: Does Mr. Schultz have sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2007-03-19
of an opinion that has specialized knowledge. And the question is: Does Mr. Schultz have sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2007-03-19
[PDF]
State v. James C. Sarlund
there is any appearance of impropriety by Mr. Farmer continuing to represent the [State]. I've considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9192 - 2017-09-19
there is any appearance of impropriety by Mr. Farmer continuing to represent the [State]. I've considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9192 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
should have called “‘Mr. Honeycutt’” to testify at a pretrial suppression hearing held regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
should have called “‘Mr. Honeycutt’” to testify at a pretrial suppression hearing held regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
ATTORNEY: My client is Mr. Larry Feaman.… He owns a business in Milwaukee. It’s a payroll administration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31313 - 2007-12-26
ATTORNEY: My client is Mr. Larry Feaman.… He owns a business in Milwaukee. It’s a payroll administration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31313 - 2007-12-26