Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6071 - 6080 of 50086 for our.
Search results 6071 - 6080 of 50086 for our.
State v. Raymond Sykes, Jr.
to it. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9055 - 2005-03-31
to it. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9055 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Curtis
a no merit report pursuant to RULE 809.32, STATS. Curtis has responded to it. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8145 - 2017-09-19
a no merit report pursuant to RULE 809.32, STATS. Curtis has responded to it. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8145 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael Davis
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our reading of the record discloses no basis for an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9743 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our reading of the record discloses no basis for an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Flisram
advised him of his right to file a response. Flisram has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12345 - 2017-09-21
advised him of his right to file a response. Flisram has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12345 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285938 - 2020-09-09
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285938 - 2020-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
is controlled by our supreme court’s recent decision in Belding v. Demoulin, 2014 WI 8, ___ Wis. 2d ___, ___ N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109119 - 2014-03-17
is controlled by our supreme court’s recent decision in Belding v. Demoulin, 2014 WI 8, ___ Wis. 2d ___, ___ N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109119 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
State v. Michael Davis
concerning ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our reading of the record discloses no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9743 - 2017-09-19
concerning ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our reading of the record discloses no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9743 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104919 - 2013-11-24
is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104919 - 2013-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). We affirmed his conviction in our first decision. We held that five of the six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29172 - 2007-05-23
, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). We affirmed his conviction in our first decision. We held that five of the six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29172 - 2007-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a child. Collins was advised of his right to file a response and has failed to respond. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460641 - 2021-12-07
of a child. Collins was advised of his right to file a response and has failed to respond. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460641 - 2021-12-07