Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6071 - 6080 of 12879 for se.
Search results 6071 - 6080 of 12879 for se.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Mark Girtler, pro se, appeals a circuit court order that dismissed Girtler’s action
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369950 - 2021-05-27
. RULE 809.23(3). Mark Girtler, pro se, appeals a circuit court order that dismissed Girtler’s action
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369950 - 2021-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or authority, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. Rule 809.23(3). Jinhua Zhu, pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354283 - 2021-04-08
or authority, except for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. Rule 809.23(3). Jinhua Zhu, pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354283 - 2021-04-08
[PDF]
State v. Quentin Antonio Carson
se, appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of armed robbery, as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9665 - 2017-09-19
se, appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of armed robbery, as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9665 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, pro se, appeals from a March 30, 2022 order denying his motion to reconsider a December 8, 2021
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660646 - 2023-05-31
, pro se, appeals from a March 30, 2022 order denying his motion to reconsider a December 8, 2021
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660646 - 2023-05-31
State v. Eugene Nichols
, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eugene Nichols appeals pro se from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Eugene Nichols appeals pro se from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Gressel, pro se, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
Gressel, pro se, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2024AP2269 2 ¶1 GUNDRUM, P.J.1 Antoinette Sample appeals pro se from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989710 - 2025-07-30
. No. 2024AP2269 2 ¶1 GUNDRUM, P.J.1 Antoinette Sample appeals pro se from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989710 - 2025-07-30
State v. Robert Garel
, concedes that he did not specifically raise the double jeopardy issue in his pro se post-sentence motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13391 - 2005-03-31
, concedes that he did not specifically raise the double jeopardy issue in his pro se post-sentence motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2006. In a rambling pro se brief, 1 The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28577 - 2014-09-15
, 2006. In a rambling pro se brief, 1 The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28577 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. DeMars
addresses whether certain constitutional rights apply. DeMars contends that Swanson is not, per se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5977 - 2017-09-19
addresses whether certain constitutional rights apply. DeMars contends that Swanson is not, per se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5977 - 2017-09-19