Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60711 - 60720 of 82810 for judgment for m s.
Search results 60711 - 60720 of 82810 for judgment for m s.
[PDF]
Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
by a decision specified in s. 227.52 shall be entitled to judicial review thereof as provided in this chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13154 - 2017-09-21
by a decision specified in s. 227.52 shall be entitled to judicial review thereof as provided in this chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Daniel S. Diehn Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Heather Bravener Clerk of Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667351 - 2023-06-15
. Daniel S. Diehn Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Heather Bravener Clerk of Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667351 - 2023-06-15
Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
in s. 227.52 shall be entitled to judicial review thereof as provided in this chapter.”).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13154 - 2005-03-31
in s. 227.52 shall be entitled to judicial review thereof as provided in this chapter.”).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13154 - 2005-03-31
Andre Wingo v. Randall R. Hepp
in the original postconviction motion and that “[s]uccessive motions and appeals, which all could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21139 - 2006-01-30
in the original postconviction motion and that “[s]uccessive motions and appeals, which all could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21139 - 2006-01-30
Julie D. v. Derek P.
“reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has violated s. 947.013.” Section 813.125(4)(a)3, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14238 - 2005-03-31
“reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has violated s. 947.013.” Section 813.125(4)(a)3, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
% Criminal 116 95 101 105 417 Percentage 50% 47% 47% 46% 47% %s of Disposition: Affirmed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209245 - 2018-03-05
% Criminal 116 95 101 105 417 Percentage 50% 47% 47% 46% 47% %s of Disposition: Affirmed
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209245 - 2018-03-05
09AP1379 State v. Eric D. Genge
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Walworth County: michael s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45888 - 2010-01-19
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Walworth County: michael s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45888 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
Research Planning v. DNR
]otwithstanding s. 77.90, the transferee is not entitled to a hearing on an order withdrawing land under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21628 - 2017-09-21
]otwithstanding s. 77.90, the transferee is not entitled to a hearing on an order withdrawing land under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21628 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Design Services v. DNR
]otwithstanding s. 77.90, the transferee is not entitled to a hearing on an order withdrawing land under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21626 - 2017-09-21
]otwithstanding s. 77.90, the transferee is not entitled to a hearing on an order withdrawing land under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21626 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to renew an issue that was inadequately raised. We disagree. ¶8 “[S]tatutory interpretation begins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29409 - 2007-06-18
to renew an issue that was inadequately raised. We disagree. ¶8 “[S]tatutory interpretation begins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29409 - 2007-06-18