Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60731 - 60740 of 68579 for law.
Search results 60731 - 60740 of 68579 for law.
State v. Richard A. Sefton
the constitutional requirements of reasonableness is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4477 - 2005-03-31
the constitutional requirements of reasonableness is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4477 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
facts satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2005-03-31
facts satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demetrius J. Grayson
facts, applied the proper standard of law, and engaged in a rational decision-making process.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25771 - 2006-08-29
facts, applied the proper standard of law, and engaged in a rational decision-making process.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25771 - 2006-08-29
State v. Kyle J. Nelson
did not have probable cause to administer the PBT. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.303 provides: If a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18180 - 2005-05-16
did not have probable cause to administer the PBT. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.303 provides: If a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18180 - 2005-05-16
Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, makes an error of law, or grants an excessive or inadequate award. Id. ¶7 An award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
, makes an error of law, or grants an excessive or inadequate award. Id. ¶7 An award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts, applies a proper standard of law, and using a demonstrated rational process reaches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543379 - 2022-07-19
facts, applies a proper standard of law, and using a demonstrated rational process reaches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543379 - 2022-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 169, 180, 567 N.W.2d 905, 910–911 (Ct. App. 1997) (“The case law is clear that the state can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97994 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 169, 180, 567 N.W.2d 905, 910–911 (Ct. App. 1997) (“The case law is clear that the state can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97994 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
sentence, which fell well within the range authorized by law, see State v. Scaccio, 2000 WI App 265, ¶18
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96346 - 2014-09-15
sentence, which fell well within the range authorized by law, see State v. Scaccio, 2000 WI App 265, ¶18
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96346 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Additionally, whether a court lost competency is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212620 - 2018-07-12
. Additionally, whether a court lost competency is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212620 - 2018-07-12