Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60791 - 60800 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 60791 - 60800 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Edward G. Stolzman v. Mary A. Stolzman
. The court reasoned that this is an appropriate case for an equalization of income primarily because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13884 - 2005-03-31
. The court reasoned that this is an appropriate case for an equalization of income primarily because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13884 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig L. Miller
as a condition of the bond. Although he was still incarcerated for an unrelated case, he was guilty of bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3345 - 2005-03-31
as a condition of the bond. Although he was still incarcerated for an unrelated case, he was guilty of bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3345 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eugene C. Rondon v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
the commission did not give his case adequate individual consideration. He contends that WIS. STAT. § 77.60(9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5048 - 2017-09-19
the commission did not give his case adequate individual consideration. He contends that WIS. STAT. § 77.60(9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5048 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Gary D. Picha v. Susan T. Picha
to the initial setting of support, not to determinations of arrearages. In this case, the court’s existing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5057 - 2017-09-19
to the initial setting of support, not to determinations of arrearages. In this case, the court’s existing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5057 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in criminal cases and the circuit court lacks inherent authority to grant a new trial under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123549 - 2017-09-21
in criminal cases and the circuit court lacks inherent authority to grant a new trial under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123549 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of trial counsel because the case law at that time did not support an objection. See State v. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97184 - 2013-05-20
of trial counsel because the case law at that time did not support an objection. See State v. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97184 - 2013-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834679 - 2024-08-08
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834679 - 2024-08-08
[PDF]
Thomas Willan v. Columbia County
raises several issues. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from Willan’s request to Columbia County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2333 - 2017-09-19
raises several issues. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from Willan’s request to Columbia County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2333 - 2017-09-19
James Hanlon v. Town Board of Milton
326, 327 (1992). Applying the standards to this case, we conclude that the independent decisionmaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10252 - 2005-03-31
326, 327 (1992). Applying the standards to this case, we conclude that the independent decisionmaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
account. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104474 - 2017-09-21
account. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104474 - 2017-09-21