Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6081 - 6090 of 49819 for our.
Search results 6081 - 6090 of 49819 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our 1 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725125 - 2023-11-07
our 1 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725125 - 2023-11-07
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104477 - 2013-11-18
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104477 - 2013-11-18
State v. Brent L. Barber.
). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals that the court considered the appropriate factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12118 - 2005-03-31
). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals that the court considered the appropriate factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Flisram
advised him of his right to file a response. Flisram has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12345 - 2017-09-21
advised him of his right to file a response. Flisram has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12345 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a child. Collins was advised of his right to file a response and has failed to respond. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460641 - 2021-12-07
of a child. Collins was advised of his right to file a response and has failed to respond. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460641 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810356 - 2024-06-06
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810356 - 2024-06-06
[PDF]
State v. Robert Curtis
a no merit report pursuant to RULE 809.32, STATS. Curtis has responded to it. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8145 - 2017-09-19
a no merit report pursuant to RULE 809.32, STATS. Curtis has responded to it. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8145 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
) authorizes trial court clerks to sign a written judgment of conviction. Our interpretation of ยง 972.13(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33465 - 2014-09-15
) authorizes trial court clerks to sign a written judgment of conviction. Our interpretation of ยง 972.13(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33465 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brent L. Barber.
3 Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals that the court considered the appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12118 - 2017-09-21
3 Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals that the court considered the appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12118 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108207 - 2014-02-16
. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108207 - 2014-02-16