Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6081 - 6090 of 50071 for our.
Search results 6081 - 6090 of 50071 for our.
CA Blank Order
) his plea colloquy was defective. Based upon our review of the briefs and the records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142684 - 2015-05-27
) his plea colloquy was defective. Based upon our review of the briefs and the records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142684 - 2015-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief brought pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2011-12). 1 Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105399 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief brought pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2011-12). 1 Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105399 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as a repeater. Baeten was advised of his right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240376 - 2019-05-07
, as a repeater. Baeten was advised of his right to respond and has failed to respond. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240376 - 2019-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252146 - 2020-01-07
our independent review of the record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252146 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
State v. David L. Viney
that there is no merit to any argument based on these issues. Our independent review of the record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12010 - 2017-09-21
that there is no merit to any argument based on these issues. Our independent review of the record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12010 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
(1). After our 1 This appeal is decided by one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98542 - 2014-09-15
(1). After our 1 This appeal is decided by one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98542 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP916-CRNM 2 a copy of the report, and has not filed a response. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214542 - 2018-06-18
. No. 2017AP916-CRNM 2 a copy of the report, and has not filed a response. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214542 - 2018-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and was, therefore, timely. See WIS. STAT. § 980.02(1m). Our review of the trial testimony shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216028 - 2018-07-20
, and was, therefore, timely. See WIS. STAT. § 980.02(1m). Our review of the trial testimony shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216028 - 2018-07-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
support. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935915 - 2025-04-02
support. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935915 - 2025-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810356 - 2024-06-06
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810356 - 2024-06-06