Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60851 - 60860 of 77949 for j o e y ' s.
Search results 60851 - 60860 of 77949 for j o e y ' s.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
indicated that she knew A.B.’s father, and the defense ultimately used a peremptory strike to remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014981 - 2025-09-25
indicated that she knew A.B.’s father, and the defense ultimately used a peremptory strike to remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014981 - 2025-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ahead of time. However, when asked whether people sometimes “make false identification[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250628 - 2019-11-26
ahead of time. However, when asked whether people sometimes “make false identification[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250628 - 2019-11-26
[PDF]
State v. Cleophus Amerson
Ivory Britton testified that she went to Denise M.’s home to investigate the reported knife fight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13460 - 2017-09-21
Ivory Britton testified that she went to Denise M.’s home to investigate the reported knife fight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13460 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to warrants outside of the [s]tate” or a “complete criminal history” when he conducted the exterior canine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=931764 - 2025-03-25
to warrants outside of the [s]tate” or a “complete criminal history” when he conducted the exterior canine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=931764 - 2025-03-25
[PDF]
State v. Larry Lamont Gatewood
the judgment. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 1, 1999, Cara S. was walking home when two men, later identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3392 - 2017-09-19
the judgment. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 1, 1999, Cara S. was walking home when two men, later identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3392 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case – the [S]tate declined cross examination of this witness. The postconviction motion’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21
case – the [S]tate declined cross examination of this witness. The postconviction motion’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William A. Pangman v. Shawano County
under s. 814.04 and reasonable attorney fees. …. (3) In order to find an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
under s. 814.04 and reasonable attorney fees. …. (3) In order to find an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because D.B.’s testimony, coupled with his work schedule, would have shown the jury how unlikely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098400 - 2026-03-31
because D.B.’s testimony, coupled with his work schedule, would have shown the jury how unlikely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098400 - 2026-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
importantly, punishment, for crossing the line and committing “disgusting” acts that had destroyed B.M.R.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129268 - 2017-09-21
importantly, punishment, for crossing the line and committing “disgusting” acts that had destroyed B.M.R.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129268 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven T. Smith
: On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Mark S. Rosen of Rosen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6004 - 2005-03-31
: On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Mark S. Rosen of Rosen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6004 - 2005-03-31