Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6091 - 6100 of 63708 for Motion for joint custody.

[MS WORD] CR-208B: Order Extending Probation for Unpaid Court Obligations/Judgment for Restitution/Judgment
1DRAFT STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff -vs...
/formdisplay/CR-208B.doc?formNumber=CR-208B&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-11-23

Lori Trost v. Keith D. Trost
that “the current custodial conditions are physically or emotionally harmful to the best interest of the child,” Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15502 - 2005-03-31

State v. Zita B.
to the petitions, the five children were taken into protective custody on October 8, 1994, and placed in foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8591 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
be without prejudice. At the motion hearing, the State argued that the length of the violation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16

COURT OF APPEALS
was in custody. A detective read Xiong his Miranda rights, and Xiong signed a form acknowledging that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55524 - 2005-06-15

[MS WORD] FA-5005V: Order to Appear Instructions
. If you and the other party filed a Joint Petition for Divorce/Legal Separation this form IS NOT required
/formdisplay/FA-5005V_instructions.doc?formNumber=FA-5005V&formType=Instructions&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-02-28

[PDF] Instructions
a Joint Petition for Divorce/Legal Separation this form IS NOT required: Do not complete it. 1
/formdisplay/FA-5005V_instructions.pdf?formNumber=FA-5005V&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-02-28

State v. Adam S. Gonzales
a judgment of conviction and an order denying the post-conviction motion of Adam S. Gonzales, the defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16467 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Martin Mellenthin v. Rodney Berger
§ 893.80(4). ¶6 The Mellenthins also opposed the summary judgment motion, arguing that even if Durand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5685 - 2017-09-19

Martin Mellenthin v. Rodney Berger
). ¶6 The Mellenthins also opposed the summary judgment motion, arguing that even if Durand Rural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5685 - 2005-03-31