Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6091 - 6100 of 29361 for er.
Search results 6091 - 6100 of 29361 for er.
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding that State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31116 - 2007-12-10
the order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the trial court erred in holding that State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31116 - 2007-12-10
CA Blank Order
letter, it contained no suggestion that the circuit court erred by ordering restitution. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143245 - 2015-06-15
letter, it contained no suggestion that the circuit court erred by ordering restitution. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143245 - 2015-06-15
[PDF]
Nate A. Lindell v. Matthew Frank
first contends that the circuit court erred when it found no merit to his sufficiency-of-the-evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26482 - 2017-09-21
first contends that the circuit court erred when it found no merit to his sufficiency-of-the-evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26482 - 2017-09-21
Karen E. Setunsky v. John C. Gallagher, M.D.
care defendants”). The Setunskys argue that the trial court erred by concluding that their claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3476 - 2005-03-31
care defendants”). The Setunskys argue that the trial court erred by concluding that their claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3476 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. William J. Sanders
. Sanders argues the trial court erred by not permitting him to examine Ms. Knight concerning prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9007 - 2005-03-31
. Sanders argues the trial court erred by not permitting him to examine Ms. Knight concerning prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9007 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred when it (1) failed to conduct the proper evidentiary analysis and failed to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
that the trial court erred when it (1) failed to conduct the proper evidentiary analysis and failed to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denial of his motion to withdraw his pleas. He contends the circuit court erred in denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294348 - 2020-10-07
denial of his motion to withdraw his pleas. He contends the circuit court erred in denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294348 - 2020-10-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by excluding evidence of the State’s alternate plea offers. The motion detailed the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155629 - 2017-09-21
erred by excluding evidence of the State’s alternate plea offers. The motion detailed the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, followed by fifteen years’ extended supervision. DISCUSSION ¶4 Kramer asserts the court erred by (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37917 - 2014-09-15
, followed by fifteen years’ extended supervision. DISCUSSION ¶4 Kramer asserts the court erred by (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37917 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Angela Jean Gustum
Gustum argues the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion and erred by denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19859 - 2017-09-21
Gustum argues the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion and erred by denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19859 - 2017-09-21