Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6091 - 6100 of 69078 for he.
Search results 6091 - 6100 of 69078 for he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on May 29, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. Bernitt appeared in court as directed, and he entered not-guilty pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255302 - 2020-02-25
on May 29, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. Bernitt appeared in court as directed, and he entered not-guilty pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255302 - 2020-02-25
State v. John R. Lootans
on appeal. First, he asserts that the State failed to show that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
on appeal. First, he asserts that the State failed to show that the arresting officer had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12333 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on supervised release, and that he would comply with treatment and rules. See Wis. Stat. § 980.08(4) (2009-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79821 - 2012-03-21
on supervised release, and that he would comply with treatment and rules. See Wis. Stat. § 980.08(4) (2009-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79821 - 2012-03-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. He argues that: (1) his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
. He argues that: (1) his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20).1 He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598174 - 2022-12-13
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2019-20).1 He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598174 - 2022-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
Hubbert was sitting on the stoop. She parked her car and approached Hubbert and asked him what he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43838 - 2009-11-23
Hubbert was sitting on the stoop. She parked her car and approached Hubbert and asked him what he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43838 - 2009-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
count of fleeing an officer. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88531 - 2012-10-22
count of fleeing an officer. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88531 - 2012-10-22
[PDF]
State v. Mark L. Stewart
to enhance his sentence. Stewart asserts he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21509 - 2017-09-21
to enhance his sentence. Stewart asserts he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the motion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21509 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25
an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that: (1) his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57484 - 2010-12-06
the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that: (1) his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57484 - 2010-12-06