Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6091 - 6100 of 58596 for speedy trial.
Search results 6091 - 6100 of 58596 for speedy trial.
Carl Edward Rucker v. Jewel Food Store
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Jewel Food Store and an employee of Jewel, Erick Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7180 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Jewel Food Store and an employee of Jewel, Erick Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7180 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sherry Mulligan v. Barbara J. Koehler
of the trial court's order assessing $1,100 in appellate attorney fees against her, when no request was made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10417 - 2017-09-20
of the trial court's order assessing $1,100 in appellate attorney fees against her, when no request was made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10417 - 2017-09-20
John A. Vassh v. Janlyn M. Lahti
judgment on her behalf or remand the matter for a new trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7262 - 2005-03-31
judgment on her behalf or remand the matter for a new trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
nor the trial court’s reasoning applied the proper legal standard for ordering involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213505 - 2018-05-30
nor the trial court’s reasoning applied the proper legal standard for ordering involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213505 - 2018-05-30
State v. Laverne R. Burchard
. Stat. § 948.025(1) (2001-02).[1] He raises two issues: (1) Whether the trial court correctly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6827 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 948.025(1) (2001-02).[1] He raises two issues: (1) Whether the trial court correctly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6827 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion sought plea withdrawal and a new trial because his trial counsel did not move to suppress his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171869 - 2017-09-21
motion sought plea withdrawal and a new trial because his trial counsel did not move to suppress his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Xiaoxia Yu v. Jiayou Zhang
bono legal services. He claims the trial court No. 99-1990 2 should instead have decreased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15805 - 2017-09-21
bono legal services. He claims the trial court No. 99-1990 2 should instead have decreased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15805 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
relief. The trial court denied them all by an order entered on May 8, 1998. It is from this order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
relief. The trial court denied them all by an order entered on May 8, 1998. It is from this order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
[1] contends that he is entitled to a new trial, notwithstanding the fact that his conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94476 - 2013-03-20
[1] contends that he is entitled to a new trial, notwithstanding the fact that his conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94476 - 2013-03-20
Lichtsinn & Haensel v. Robert Eisold
appeal from a judgment following a bench trial awarding the law firm of Lichtsinn and Haensel, S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10190 - 2005-03-31
appeal from a judgment following a bench trial awarding the law firm of Lichtsinn and Haensel, S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10190 - 2005-03-31