Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 611 - 620 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
Search results 611 - 620 of 45080 for Cost-effective.
Bill's Distributing, Ltd. v. Gerald Cormican
trespass.[2] The legislature amended the statute by 1999 Wis. Act 190, § 15, effective June 2, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4413 - 2005-03-31
trespass.[2] The legislature amended the statute by 1999 Wis. Act 190, § 15, effective June 2, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4413 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bill's Distributing, Ltd. v. Gerald Cormican
that part of the order, and we therefore affirm it. We use the term “restoration” to mean the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4413 - 2017-09-19
that part of the order, and we therefore affirm it. We use the term “restoration” to mean the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4413 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
practice of law. We also determine that Attorney Chavez should be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84684 - 2012-07-09
practice of law. We also determine that Attorney Chavez should be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84684 - 2012-07-09
[PDF]
WI 102
) that no costs be assessed against Attorney Smead. ¶2 Attorney Smead was admitted to practice law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75496 - 2014-09-15
) that no costs be assessed against Attorney Smead. ¶2 Attorney Smead was admitted to practice law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75496 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 24
to SCR 22.17(2).1 Costs 1 SCR 22.17(2) states
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94388 - 2014-09-15
to SCR 22.17(2).1 Costs 1 SCR 22.17(2) states
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94388 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
proceeds pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).[1] Costs totaling $40,960.49 as of August 6, 2012, are disputed.[2] We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94388 - 2013-03-24
proceeds pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).[1] Costs totaling $40,960.49 as of August 6, 2012, are disputed.[2] We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94388 - 2013-03-24
[PDF]
Certification
the surcharge and the costs the surcharge is intended to fund, and yet still found that the effect
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192210 - 2017-09-21
the surcharge and the costs the surcharge is intended to fund, and yet still found that the effect
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192210 - 2017-09-21
Metropolitan Builders Association v. Village of Germantown
that the Village may apply the collected funds only to the proportion of the cost attributable to development
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17626 - 2005-05-24
that the Village may apply the collected funds only to the proportion of the cost attributable to development
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17626 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
Metropolitan Builders Association v. Village of Germantown
of the cost attributable to development. It must return any excess to the current lot owners. ¶2 In April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17626 - 2017-09-21
of the cost attributable to development. It must return any excess to the current lot owners. ¶2 In April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17626 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
of six months, effective the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259926 - 2020-05-05
of six months, effective the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259926 - 2020-05-05