Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 611 - 620 of 80648 for petition to establish custody.
Search results 611 - 620 of 80648 for petition to establish custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
was insufficient to establish the allegations in the petition. We disagree. ¶19 In the April 19, 2007 incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35741 - 2014-09-15
was insufficient to establish the allegations in the petition. We disagree. ¶19 In the April 19, 2007 incident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35741 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
at the fact-finding hearing was insufficient to establish the conduct alleged in the delinquency petition. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35741 - 2009-03-10
at the fact-finding hearing was insufficient to establish the conduct alleged in the delinquency petition. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35741 - 2009-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to prevent the officers from taking her into custody. The undisputed evidence established that Delong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118464 - 2014-09-15
to prevent the officers from taking her into custody. The undisputed evidence established that Delong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118464 - 2014-09-15
Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
of legal custody, there is no provision establishing a presumption of joint placement. Keller, 256 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
of legal custody, there is no provision establishing a presumption of joint placement. Keller, 256 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
Complete Title of Case: † Petition for review filed IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: ARLENE ARNOLD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6578 - 2017-09-19
Complete Title of Case: † Petition for review filed IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: ARLENE ARNOLD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6578 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521830 - 2022-05-18
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521830 - 2022-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relating to the custody and placement of his minor children. The order left in place Fox’s existing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622750 - 2023-02-16
relating to the custody and placement of his minor children. The order left in place Fox’s existing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622750 - 2023-02-16
[PDF]
Marvin G. Bartholf v. Rita J. Bartholf
to establish that a substantial change of circumstances has occurred since the initial custody and placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16269 - 2017-09-21
to establish that a substantial change of circumstances has occurred since the initial custody and placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16269 - 2017-09-21
Marvin G. Bartholf v. Rita J. Bartholf
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16269 - 2005-03-31
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16269 - 2005-03-31
Tammie J. C. v. Robert T. R.
., Petitioner-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Robert T.R., Respondent-Appellant. REVIEW
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16558 - 2005-03-31
., Petitioner-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Robert T.R., Respondent-Appellant. REVIEW
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16558 - 2005-03-31