Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6101 - 6110 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 6101 - 6110 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Fred V. Vogelsberg
the trial court properly determined that: (1) Vogelsberg reasonably believed that he was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19852 - 2005-10-05
the trial court properly determined that: (1) Vogelsberg reasonably believed that he was in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19852 - 2005-10-05
[PDF]
State v. Fred V. Vogelsberg
court properly determined that: (1) Vogelsberg reasonably believed that he was in custody at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19852 - 2017-09-21
court properly determined that: (1) Vogelsberg reasonably believed that he was in custody at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19852 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was in custody awaiting trial on the delivery of cocaine charge, he could have filed a motion for visitation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35626 - 2009-02-18
was in custody awaiting trial on the delivery of cocaine charge, he could have filed a motion for visitation. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35626 - 2009-02-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
, after his release from custody, Bobby contacted Denise. He was living then with his girlfriend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35626 - 2014-09-15
, after his release from custody, Bobby contacted Denise. He was living then with his girlfriend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35626 - 2014-09-15
Firstar Trust Company v. First National Bank of Kenosha
assets included in Dorothy Cooney's gross estate. Id. The Estate and the Trust filed cross-motions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16875 - 2005-03-31
assets included in Dorothy Cooney's gross estate. Id. The Estate and the Trust filed cross-motions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16875 - 2005-03-31
Buckley J. Kain v. Shelly L. Kain
to Shelly. In the divorce judgment six and one-half months later, the trial court returned custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13832 - 2005-03-31
to Shelly. In the divorce judgment six and one-half months later, the trial court returned custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Buckley J. Kain v. Shelly L. Kain
. In the divorce judgment six and one- half months later, the trial court returned custody to Buckley. Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13832 - 2014-09-15
. In the divorce judgment six and one- half months later, the trial court returned custody to Buckley. Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13832 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
-08)[1]. Sahs argues that the trial court erred when it denied both his motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
-08)[1]. Sahs argues that the trial court erred when it denied both his motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
-08)1. Sahs argues that the trial court erred when it denied both his motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55869 - 2014-09-15
-08)1. Sahs argues that the trial court erred when it denied both his motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55869 - 2014-09-15
State v. Zita B.
to the petitions, the five children were taken into protective custody on October 8, 1994, and placed in foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8591 - 2005-03-31
to the petitions, the five children were taken into protective custody on October 8, 1994, and placed in foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8591 - 2005-03-31