Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61041 - 61050 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61041 - 61050 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that this was just a straight probation case which would not require any jail time at all. No. 2010AP9-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53364 - 2014-09-15
that this was just a straight probation case which would not require any jail time at all. No. 2010AP9-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53364 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392427 - 2021-07-14
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=392427 - 2021-07-14
[PDF]
Judy Hagner v. Herbert Usow
TRO AND COURT INJUNCTION ORDER OF HARRASMENT [sic].” (Upper casing in original.) Hagner later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7965 - 2017-09-19
TRO AND COURT INJUNCTION ORDER OF HARRASMENT [sic].” (Upper casing in original.) Hagner later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7965 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Eugene C. Rondon v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
the commission did not give his case adequate individual consideration. He contends that WIS. STAT. § 77.60(9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5048 - 2017-09-19
the commission did not give his case adequate individual consideration. He contends that WIS. STAT. § 77.60(9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5048 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872279 - 2024-11-06
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872279 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. VanPatter
; and the last factor is the need to protect the public. [This case involves v]ery serious conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10505 - 2017-09-20
; and the last factor is the need to protect the public. [This case involves v]ery serious conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10505 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Larry E. Kraemer
or on appeal. Where the elements of a civil offense are undisputed, a case should be taken from the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13356 - 2017-09-21
or on appeal. Where the elements of a civil offense are undisputed, a case should be taken from the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13356 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In these consolidated cases, Sergio L. Ratliff appeals from two judgments of conviction. Ratliff’s appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147480 - 2017-09-21
. In these consolidated cases, Sergio L. Ratliff appeals from two judgments of conviction. Ratliff’s appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147480 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court relied on inaccurate information when it imposed the sentences in these cases. At no point did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208937 - 2018-02-27
court relied on inaccurate information when it imposed the sentences in these cases. At no point did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208937 - 2018-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175189 - 2017-09-21
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175189 - 2017-09-21