Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6111 - 6120 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 6111 - 6120 of 24568 for extending.
CA Blank Order
court ordered Miller to serve two years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103795 - 2013-10-29
court ordered Miller to serve two years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103795 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
within 14 days after the temporary restraining order is issued, unless the time is extended upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257576 - 2020-04-14
within 14 days after the temporary restraining order is issued, unless the time is extended upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257576 - 2020-04-14
State v. Edward D. Lewis
and eighteen months of extended supervision to run consecutive to any existing sentence. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3610 - 2005-03-31
and eighteen months of extended supervision to run consecutive to any existing sentence. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3610 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 years of initial confinement and twenty years of extended supervision. In regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886289 - 2024-12-05
2 years of initial confinement and twenty years of extended supervision. In regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886289 - 2024-12-05
State v. Bobbie K.
in evaluating good cause, no evidence exists in the record to show that any party was seeking to extend the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25597 - 2006-06-19
in evaluating good cause, no evidence exists in the record to show that any party was seeking to extend the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25597 - 2006-06-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement and eighteen years’ extended supervision. At sentencing, the court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178258 - 2017-09-21
’ initial confinement and eighteen years’ extended supervision. At sentencing, the court imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and nine years’ extended supervision. Counsel identifies two potential issues: whether there is any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99433 - 2014-09-15
and nine years’ extended supervision. Counsel identifies two potential issues: whether there is any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99433 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of both his probation in one case and his extended supervision in another case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72493 - 2014-09-15
of both his probation in one case and his extended supervision in another case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72493 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to recommend a sentence of three years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision, to run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72887 - 2011-10-31
to recommend a sentence of three years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision, to run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72887 - 2011-10-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 years of initial confinement and twenty years of extended supervision. In regard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886289 - 2024-12-05
2 years of initial confinement and twenty years of extended supervision. In regard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886289 - 2024-12-05