Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61151 - 61160 of 91845 for 1.
Search results 61151 - 61160 of 91845 for 1.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2020AP212-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Chelsea Jo Howell appeals a judgment of conviction. Howell argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341489 - 2021-03-04
). No. 2020AP212-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Chelsea Jo Howell appeals a judgment of conviction. Howell argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341489 - 2021-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22)1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732696 - 2023-11-29
a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021-22)1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732696 - 2023-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 Because there are insufficient findings on the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650932 - 2023-05-03
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 Because there are insufficient findings on the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650932 - 2023-05-03
[PDF]
State v. Willie F. Hannah
demonstrate that a juror’s testimony is admissible under sec. 906.06(2)[, STATS.,] by establishing (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12912 - 2017-09-21
demonstrate that a juror’s testimony is admissible under sec. 906.06(2)[, STATS.,] by establishing (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12912 - 2017-09-21
City of Appleton v. Alan F. Schleinz
: michael w. gage, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Alan Schleinz appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7432 - 2005-03-31
: michael w. gage, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1] Alan Schleinz appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7432 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Kelly and Adele Kelly cross-appeal various aspects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50802 - 2010-06-09
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael Kelly and Adele Kelly cross-appeal various aspects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50802 - 2010-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.32 (2023-24),1 concluding that no grounds exist to challenge Pecore’s convictions for attempting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973589 - 2025-06-24
809.32 (2023-24),1 concluding that no grounds exist to challenge Pecore’s convictions for attempting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973589 - 2025-06-24
Randy Major v. County of Milwaukee
that the property was “filled in land with foundry sand 10 to 12 feet in depth.”[1] No one on this appeal disputes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9060 - 2005-03-31
that the property was “filled in land with foundry sand 10 to 12 feet in depth.”[1] No one on this appeal disputes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9060 - 2005-03-31
Susan Hanmer v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.
, and judgment was entered in favor of Dr. Beran and the Fort Atkinson Medical Center on November 1, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8052 - 2005-03-31
, and judgment was entered in favor of Dr. Beran and the Fort Atkinson Medical Center on November 1, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8052 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin M. Kelsay
license suspended. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review the referee's recommendation that Attorney Kevin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16665 - 2005-03-31
license suspended. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We review the referee's recommendation that Attorney Kevin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16665 - 2005-03-31