Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61151 - 61160 of 84050 for simple case search.

[PDF] Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
for termination; (2) it was also “intrinsically unfair” to send the case to the jury because the petitions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2365 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Thomas Jelinski v. Michael Barr
and counterclaimed for an additional $565.85 to cover the total damages to the apartment carpet. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15473 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Donald B.
to § 48.415(2). ¶8 The case was presented to a jury in August 1999. The jury returned a unanimous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2328 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502548 - 2022-04-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367802 - 2021-05-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the sentence was not unduly harsh based on the facts of the case. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181, ¶21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333923 - 2021-02-11

[PDF] Brian Mau v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
Company of Wisconsin, Inc. 2 After a three-week jury trial in this medical malpractice case, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4881 - 2017-09-19

State v. Herman Whiterabbit
was not entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because the State’s case was dependent upon the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31

State v. William Medina
disease or defect on August 20, 1994. The case proceeded to trial. The defense rested without offering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13376 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190, a supreme court case that came after Rohner. ¶5 In Rohner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143831 - 2017-09-21