Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61181 - 61190 of 64735 for b's.
Search results 61181 - 61190 of 64735 for b's.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
age thirteen). See WIS. STAT. §§ 939.50(3)(b), 948.02(1)(e). Thus, the sentence is presumptively
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594965 - 2022-11-29
age thirteen). See WIS. STAT. §§ 939.50(3)(b), 948.02(1)(e). Thus, the sentence is presumptively
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594965 - 2022-11-29
WI App 6 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP2690-CR Complete Titl...
and 939.63(1)(b) (2007-08),[1] and three counts of armed robbery with use of force, as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57894 - 2011-01-30
and 939.63(1)(b) (2007-08),[1] and three counts of armed robbery with use of force, as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57894 - 2011-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. As a result, we reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.[6] B. The trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35246 - 2010-06-09
. As a result, we reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.[6] B. The trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35246 - 2010-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
to all three issues raised by Welch. B. The filing of the amended information did not prejudice Welch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34343 - 2008-10-20
to all three issues raised by Welch. B. The filing of the amended information did not prejudice Welch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34343 - 2008-10-20
State v. Robert J. Flores
in denying that portion of Flores’s motion. B. Franks v. Delaware Motion. ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19485 - 2005-09-06
in denying that portion of Flores’s motion. B. Franks v. Delaware Motion. ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19485 - 2005-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. (2005-06). [1] State v. Wirts, 176 Wis. 2d 174, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33898 - 2008-09-02
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. (2005-06). [1] State v. Wirts, 176 Wis. 2d 174, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33898 - 2008-09-02
State v. Samuel Nelis
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25040 - 2006-05-03
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25040 - 2006-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
, and decided that the contract was not void under the Wisconsin Statute of Frauds. B. Exclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142778 - 2015-06-03
, and decided that the contract was not void under the Wisconsin Statute of Frauds. B. Exclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142778 - 2015-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62026 - 2011-03-28
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62026 - 2011-03-28