Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61181 - 61190 of 63277 for records.
Search results 61181 - 61190 of 63277 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
recorded appointments for customers at Deonne’s.” Shafel counters that this evidence fails to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28661 - 2007-04-04
recorded appointments for customers at Deonne’s.” Shafel counters that this evidence fails to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28661 - 2007-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” and confirmed that he would be “withdrawing his NGI plea.” The offer, which was detailed on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249234 - 2019-10-30
” and confirmed that he would be “withdrawing his NGI plea.” The offer, which was detailed on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249234 - 2019-10-30
[PDF]
WI APP 108
, “you’d be sitting the rest of your life in prison as well as you should be.” The record here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100162 - 2017-09-21
, “you’d be sitting the rest of your life in prison as well as you should be.” The record here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100162 - 2017-09-21
State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
with other evidence in the record that a court must examine in assessing counsel’s overall performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4539 - 2005-03-31
with other evidence in the record that a court must examine in assessing counsel’s overall performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4539 - 2005-03-31
SCR CHAPTER 23
proceeding in which legal pleadings are filed or a record is established as the basis for judicial review. (4
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85224 - 2012-07-18
proceeding in which legal pleadings are filed or a record is established as the basis for judicial review. (4
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85224 - 2012-07-18
[PDF]
State v. Tyrone L. Dubose
of the record does not reveal that any of the factual findings are clearly erroneous. Therefore, we turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6619 - 2017-09-19
of the record does not reveal that any of the factual findings are clearly erroneous. Therefore, we turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6619 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the record on appeal. This does not matter, under the logic of McIntyre’s argument, because the filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105846 - 2017-09-21
of the record on appeal. This does not matter, under the logic of McIntyre’s argument, because the filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105846 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assault was inaccurate because, according to Mackie, it was not supported by any evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215254 - 2018-07-05
assault was inaccurate because, according to Mackie, it was not supported by any evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215254 - 2018-07-05
[PDF]
WI APP 12
was harmless because the record shows the jury understood the scope of prohibited contact under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132253 - 2017-09-21
was harmless because the record shows the jury understood the scope of prohibited contact under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record that any of these findings are clearly erroneous. ¶19 In sum, we reject McCreary’s attempts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142994 - 2017-09-21
to the record that any of these findings are clearly erroneous. ¶19 In sum, we reject McCreary’s attempts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142994 - 2017-09-21

