Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6121 - 6130 of 40310 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.

[PDF] State v. Daniel L. Raisbeck
for modification of his sentences. But the material accompanying his motion did not assert any new factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8379 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
Attorney General P.O. Box 7857 Madison, WI 53707-7857 Anthony D. Ward 592753 New Lisbon Corr. Inst. P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111898 - 2014-05-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Peters Electronic Notice Thadous Levelle Beard, Jr. 515125 New Lisbon Correctional Inst. P.O. Box
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=991894 - 2025-07-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Peters Electronic Notice Thadous Levelle Beard, Jr. 515125 New Lisbon Correctional Inst. P.O. Box
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=991894 - 2025-07-30

COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court erroneously rejected Hunter’s claim that a new factor warrants sentence modification. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58253 - 2010-12-27

[PDF] William Harris v. Gary R. McCaughtry
Harris a new hearing. In its order dated December 6, 2004, the circuit court adopted a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21407 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel L. Raisbeck
. But the material accompanying his motion did not assert any new factors to support a sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8379 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael O. Thomas
is entitled to a new trial because, he argues, one of the State’s witnesses committed perjury. He also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Jimmie Johnson appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64240 - 2011-05-16

State v. Nathaniel Jordan
of the inaccurate information constituted a “new factor” that justified sentence modification. The court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21549 - 2006-02-27