Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61231 - 61240 of 64735 for b's.

[PDF] State v. Ludwig Guzman
penalty enhancer. No. 99-2249-CR 5 B. Jury Selection ¶9 Guzman’s next claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15918 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. Panel2 2014-09-15T18:35:40-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98851 - 2014-09-15

State v. James L. Larson
. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b). The complaint alleged that this was a second offense, making it a criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5822 - 2014-04-06

Robert A. Smith v. Janet H. Sahagian
it is clearly erroneous. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2) (1997-98);[3] Preuss, 195 Wis. 2d at 107. B. The Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15587 - 2008-03-13

Frontsheet
the property listed on V.J.'s Schedule B (which requires the debtor to list all personal property
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33468 - 2008-07-17

COURT OF APPEALS
was: “He said I can search him.” ¶6 Wilson said he asked the men if he could search them “[b]ecause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33393 - 2011-03-15

[PDF] NOTICE
not support the court’s decision based on the required statutory factors. Id. Thus, we concluded that “[b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29235 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195186 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Edward Garrett
was justified by exigent circumstances. B. Entry Into the Closet ¶19 Garrett next claims that the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3307 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Steven Joel Sharp v. Case Corporation
and deterrence. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11378 - 2017-09-19