Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61271 - 61280 of 64755 for b's.
Search results 61271 - 61280 of 64755 for b's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” and that “[b]oth the prosecutor and the trial judge acquiesced in this view and permitted Riekkoff to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23
” and that “[b]oth the prosecutor and the trial judge acquiesced in this view and permitted Riekkoff to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753473 - 2024-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133343 - 2006-03-08
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133343 - 2006-03-08
State v. Ervin Burris
the relevant statutory factors, as enumerated under § 980.06(2)b, Stats. That section provides in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13204 - 2005-11-30
the relevant statutory factors, as enumerated under § 980.06(2)b, Stats. That section provides in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13204 - 2005-11-30
Philip M. Mydlach v. Wayne Curt Kiser
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] CCI’s purchase of Starting Point was completed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6178 - 2005-03-31
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] CCI’s purchase of Starting Point was completed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6178 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph J. Martinkoski, Sr.
to the recommendations of the district attorney and presentence investigation, "[b]ut ultimately I will make the final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8147 - 2005-03-31
to the recommendations of the district attorney and presentence investigation, "[b]ut ultimately I will make the final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8147 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 155
618 (1978), our supreme court observed that “[b]y allowing the agency to designate the first test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55125 - 2010-11-16
618 (1978), our supreme court observed that “[b]y allowing the agency to designate the first test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55125 - 2010-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[b]ased on our scrutiny of the record, … neither the trial court’s own statements about the placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29235 - 2007-05-30
that “[b]ased on our scrutiny of the record, … neither the trial court’s own statements about the placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29235 - 2007-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] See State v. Machner, 92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29241 - 2007-05-29
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] See State v. Machner, 92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29241 - 2007-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
consider such a charge at all.[2] However, Wis. Stat. § 973.20(1g)(b) defines a read-in charge as: [a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30433 - 2007-04-02
consider such a charge at all.[2] However, Wis. Stat. § 973.20(1g)(b) defines a read-in charge as: [a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30433 - 2007-04-02
Dane County v. Kenneth R. McGrew
. This opinion will not be published. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4 (2001-02). [1] This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6648 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4 (2001-02). [1] This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6648 - 2005-03-31