Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6131 - 6140 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 6131 - 6140 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
-08)[1]. Sahs argues that the trial court erred when it denied both his motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
-08)[1]. Sahs argues that the trial court erred when it denied both his motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
State v. Turnel W. Smith
that while they can be prosecuted for escape from jail if they are in the actual custody of the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12016 - 2005-03-31
that while they can be prosecuted for escape from jail if they are in the actual custody of the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12016 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce D. Dybdal
that while they can be prosecuted for escape from jail if they are in the actual custody of the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12334 - 2005-03-31
that while they can be prosecuted for escape from jail if they are in the actual custody of the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bruce D. Dybdal
if they are in the actual custody of the jail, they cannot be prosecuted for escape while on work release. They reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12334 - 2017-09-21
if they are in the actual custody of the jail, they cannot be prosecuted for escape while on work release. They reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Turnel W. Smith
if they are in the actual custody of the jail, they cannot be prosecuted for escape while on work release. They reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12016 - 2017-09-21
if they are in the actual custody of the jail, they cannot be prosecuted for escape while on work release. They reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12016 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). See, e.g., P.C. v. C.C. (In Interest of A.E.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29586 - 2007-07-04
Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). See, e.g., P.C. v. C.C. (In Interest of A.E.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29586 - 2007-07-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
, fourth offense. He challenges the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29988 - 2014-09-15
, fourth offense. He challenges the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29988 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert J. King
dispensed with a presentence report, and the trial court accepted the parties’ joint sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11235 - 2005-03-31
dispensed with a presentence report, and the trial court accepted the parties’ joint sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11235 - 2005-03-31
Interstate Sealant & Concrete, Inc. v. Robert Schlueter
restoration in direct competition with Interstate, violating the noncompete agreement. On motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6592 - 2005-03-31
restoration in direct competition with Interstate, violating the noncompete agreement. On motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Interstate Sealant & Concrete, Inc. v. Robert Schlueter
the noncompete agreement. On motion for summary judgment, the trial court concluded that the noncompete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6592 - 2017-09-19
the noncompete agreement. On motion for summary judgment, the trial court concluded that the noncompete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6592 - 2017-09-19