Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6131 - 6140 of 75049 for judgment for us.

Arthur H. Hurckman v. Secura Insurance Company
and requires us to affirm the trial court's decision. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9898 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and Twin City now appeals.1 DISCUSSION ¶10 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93318 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decisions de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93318 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] Arthur H. Hurckman v. Secura Insurance Company
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: MORIA G. KRUEGER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9898 - 2017-09-19

Wendi Louah v. St. Mary's Hospital
contends that summary judgment was inappropriate because there were genuine issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14571 - 2005-03-31

James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
”) appeal the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of American Standard Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7217 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
, “Oldenhoff”) appeal the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of American Standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7217 - 2017-09-20

State v. Nick Allen
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: VICTOR MANIAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10693 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Sauk County: James Evenson, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32088 - 2008-03-12

State v. Joshua T. Howard
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6577 - 2005-03-31