Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6131 - 6140 of 64133 for records/1000.
Search results 6131 - 6140 of 64133 for records/1000.
Philip Anderson v. Judith Leamy
they are unsupported by the record and are, therefore, clearly erroneous. Section 805.17(2), Stats. We search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14536 - 2005-03-31
they are unsupported by the record and are, therefore, clearly erroneous. Section 805.17(2), Stats. We search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14536 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, Bartelt’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209624 - 2018-03-15
of the report, Bartelt’s response, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209624 - 2018-03-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25
an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082114 - 2026-02-25
State v. Emmanuel Page
to the response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10477 - 2005-03-31
to the response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10477 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP2228-CRNM 2 the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143682 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP2228-CRNM 2 the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143682 - 2017-09-21
State v. Koua v.
is to state his or her finding with respect to the criteria on the record, and, if the judge determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9569 - 2005-03-31
is to state his or her finding with respect to the criteria on the record, and, if the judge determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9569 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jesse Rodgers
a sentence on that date because it wanted to review the medical records relating to Rodgers's condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11061 - 2005-03-31
a sentence on that date because it wanted to review the medical records relating to Rodgers's condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11061 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jean H.
to the record, the trial date of February 1, 1999, was selected on August 12, 1998.[4] The petition had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
to the record, the trial date of February 1, 1999, was selected on August 12, 1998.[4] The petition had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15634 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
order “for the reasons set forth on the record at the time of the hearing.” Driessen now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61402 - 2014-09-15
order “for the reasons set forth on the record at the time of the hearing.” Driessen now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61402 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of counsel. Upon our review of the record, no-merit report, and response, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96145 - 2014-09-15
of counsel. Upon our review of the record, no-merit report, and response, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96145 - 2014-09-15