Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61301 - 61310 of 83293 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 61301 - 61310 of 83293 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Arthur B. Patton
, 593 N.W.2d 504 (Ct. App. 1999). However, we independently examine the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
, 593 N.W.2d 504 (Ct. App. 1999). However, we independently examine the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
406, 659 N.W.2d 394. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 This case concerns a routine traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196751 - 2017-10-02
406, 659 N.W.2d 394. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 This case concerns a routine traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196751 - 2017-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The case proceeded to a jury trial that lasted over two weeks, involved nearly fifty witnesses, and had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
The case proceeded to a jury trial that lasted over two weeks, involved nearly fifty witnesses, and had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Rodney K. Stenseth
2003 WI App 198 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-3330-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5974 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 198 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-3330-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5974 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
talk about this issue. Why a day and a half [to try the case to the court]? I mean, if we waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34660 - 2014-09-15
talk about this issue. Why a day and a half [to try the case to the court]? I mean, if we waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34660 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267886 - 2020-07-08
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267886 - 2020-07-08
[PDF]
State v. Rick E. Norem
The trial court agreed that is generally the case, but expressed concern that the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3759 - 2017-09-19
The trial court agreed that is generally the case, but expressed concern that the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3759 - 2017-09-19
Robert J. Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Board of Appeals
2005 WI App 106 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP1787
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24
2005 WI App 106 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP1787
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7584 - 2005-05-24
Shawano County v. Bermuda A. H.
. It is only then that the court may entertain a best interests analysis. In all other cases, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2755 - 2005-03-31
. It is only then that the court may entertain a best interests analysis. In all other cases, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2755 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 63
2008 WI App 63 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2026 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32110 - 2008-04-29
2008 WI App 63 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2026 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32110 - 2008-04-29