Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61321 - 61330 of 68579 for law.
Search results 61321 - 61330 of 68579 for law.
State v. Richard A. Sefton
the constitutional requirements of reasonableness is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4477 - 2005-03-31
the constitutional requirements of reasonableness is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Fields
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4477 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
facts satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2005-03-31
facts satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6973 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demetrius J. Grayson
facts, applied the proper standard of law, and engaged in a rational decision-making process.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25771 - 2006-08-29
facts, applied the proper standard of law, and engaged in a rational decision-making process.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25771 - 2006-08-29
State v. Kyle J. Nelson
did not have probable cause to administer the PBT. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.303 provides: If a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18180 - 2005-05-16
did not have probable cause to administer the PBT. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.303 provides: If a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18180 - 2005-05-16
Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
Joanne L. Stuckey v. David H. Stuckey
a reasoning process which considers the applicable law and the facts of record, leading to a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16055 - 2008-01-30
a reasoning process which considers the applicable law and the facts of record, leading to a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16055 - 2008-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
, makes an error of law, or grants an excessive or inadequate award. Id. ¶7 An award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
, makes an error of law, or grants an excessive or inadequate award. Id. ¶7 An award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
Dunn County v. Peggy R.
met its burden is normally a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7311 - 2014-03-24
met its burden is normally a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7311 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
Furnishings Unlimited, Inc. v. Department of Industry
Council, 467 U.S. 837, 843 (1984)). Whether a statute is ambiguous is a question of law, and a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10022 - 2017-09-19
Council, 467 U.S. 837, 843 (1984)). Whether a statute is ambiguous is a question of law, and a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10022 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
understanding of the law that exists [in] Batson[3] is that they don’t have to have a good reason. They have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778878 - 2024-03-27
understanding of the law that exists [in] Batson[3] is that they don’t have to have a good reason. They have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778878 - 2024-03-27